14 research outputs found

    Medial Temporal Lobe Activity for Recognition of Recent and Remote Famous Names: an Event-Related fMRI Study

    Get PDF
    Previous neuroimaging studies examining recognition of famous faces have identified activation of an extensive bilateral neural network [Gorno Tempini, M. L., Price, C. J., Josephs, O., Vandenberghe, R., Cappa, S. F., Kapur, N. et al. (1998). The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing. Brain, 121, 2103–2118], including the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and specifically the hippocampal complex [Haist, F., Bowden, G. J., & Mao, H. (2001). Consolidation of human memory over decades revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1139–1145; Leveroni, C. L., Seidenberg, M., Mayer, A. R., Mead, L. A., Binder, J. R., & Rao, S. M. (2000). Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 878–886]. One model of hippocampal functioning in autobiographical, episodic memory retrieval argues that the hippocampal complex remains active in retrieval tasks regardless of time or age of memory (multiple trace theory, MTT), whereas another proposal posits that the hippocampal complex plays a time-limited role in retrieval of autobiographical memories. The current event-related fMRI study focused on the medial temporal lobe and its response to recognition judgments of famous names from two distinct time epochs (1990s and 1950s) in 15 right-handed healthy older adults (mean age = 70 years). A pilot study with an independent sample of young and older subjects ensured that the stimuli were representative of a recent and remote time period. Increased MR signal activity was observed on a bilateral basis for both the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) during recognition of familiar names from both the recent and remote time periods when compared to non-famous names. However, the impulse response functions in the right hippocampus and right PHG demonstrated a differential response to stimuli from different time epochs, with the 1990s names showing the greatest MR signal intensity change, followed by the 1950s names, followed by foils. The finding that recognition of famous names produced significant bilateral MTL activation regardless of time epoch relative to foils provides support for the MTT model. However, the finding of a temporal gradient in the right MTL also provides support for the HC model, given the greater MTL response associated with recently famous names relative to remotely famous names

    Resting-State Functional MR Imaging for Determining Language Laterality in Intractable Epilepsy

    No full text
    Purpose To measure the accuracy of resting-state functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in determining hemispheric language dominance in patients with medically intractable focal epilepsies against the results of an intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP). Materials and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board, and all subjects gave signed informed consent. Data in 23 patients with medically intractable focal epilepsy were retrospectively analyzed. All 23 patients were candidates for epilepsy surgery and underwent both IAP and resting-state functional MR imaging as part of presurgical evaluation. Language dominance was determined from functional MR imaging data by calculating a laterality index (LI) after using independent component analysis. The accuracy of this method was assessed against that of IAP by using a variety of thresholds. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using leave-one-out cross validation. Spatial maps of language components were qualitatively compared among each hemispheric language dominance group. Results Measurement of hemispheric language dominance with resting-state functional MR imaging was highly concordant with IAP results, with up to 96% (22 of 23) accuracy, 96% (22 of 23) sensitivity, and 96% (22 of 23) specificity. Composite language component maps in patients with typical language laterality consistently included classic language areas such as the inferior frontal gyrus, the posterior superior temporal gyrus, and the inferior parietal lobule, while those of patients with atypical language laterality also included non-classical language areas such as the superior and middle frontal gyri, the insula, and the occipital cortex. Conclusion Resting-state functional MR imaging can be used to measure language laterality in patients with medically intractable focal epilepsy. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article

    Characteristics of patients with preserved and disturbed memory functioning.

    No full text
    <p>Note. PCC = posterior cingulate cortex, rs-fMRI = resting-state fMRI, t-fMRI = task fMRI. Elements indicate mean (standard deviation). There were no significant differences in these variables between patients with preserved versus disturbed memory functioning, apart from full IQ which was significantly lower in memory disturbed patients (* p = 0.030).</p><p>Characteristics of patients with preserved and disturbed memory functioning.</p

    cPCC flexibility with varying window lengths in memory preserved and disturbed patients.

    No full text
    <p>Note.</p><p>** p<0.05,</p><p>* p<0.01. Values indicate mean (SD) of cPCC flexibility. P-values based on Mann-Whitney U-tests.</p><p>cPCC flexibility with varying window lengths in memory preserved and disturbed patients.</p

    Differences in resting-state flexibility of connections from the cPCC between memory preserved and disturbed patients.

    No full text
    <p>The 5% largest differences in connections between memory preserved and memory disturbed LTLE patients (i.e. preserved—disturbed) are depicted in white. Furthermore, nodal group differences in flexibility with the cPCC (large node in red) are depicted in color and size, with smaller blue nodes indicating no significant difference (P > 0.05), and bigger green nodes referring to significant decreases in resting-state flexibility in the memory disturbed patients (P < 0.001). For reference, the left cortical surface is displayed in grey.</p
    corecore